The First Chinese Cataphracts: 3世纪中国始重骑兵


Art by 松石郎
Music: Rising Fire


Horsemen's armor became significantly heavier in the Three Kingdoms period and the 3 centuries of disunity that followed. This included the 3 Kingdoms period, Jin, 16 Kingdoms, and the Northern and Southern dynasties period. Iron faulds also began to appear in large quantities. 




Most of the warhorse was covered in heavy armor also appeared during this period.

Iron Horses: The Jin (265–420) would see some of the first true heavy cavalries in China. The development of heavy cavalry in China corresponded with the invention of double stirrups. To this day, some of the earliest heavy horse armor were dated to the Jin dynasty. 







→ ☯ [PLEASE SUPPORT ME @ PATREON] ☯ ←

Thank you to my Patrons who has contributed $10 and above: You made this happen!

➢ ☯ Muramasa
➢ ☯ MK Celahir
➢ ☯ Kevin
➢ ☯ Vincent Ho (FerrumFlos1st)
➢ ☯ BurenErdene Altankhuyag
➢ ☯ Stephen D Rynerson
➢ ☯ Michael Lam
➢ ☯ Peter Hellman
➢ ☯ SunB


Comments

Der said…
I wonder how much influence Sassanian Persia had on Jin heavy cavalry? You call them cataphract which have their origins in Persia.

Also, if stirrups were the impetus for the development of heavy cavalry, what was cavalry like before stirrups? The Companion Cavalry of Alexander, the cavalry of the State of Zhao during the Warring States, etc. Were they unimportant to the outcome of battles maybe? is that why the Romans neglected their cavalry? and was it true cavalry, or just a sort of dragoon force where soldiers rode a horse to various parts of the battlefield and then got off and fought as infantry??
Dragon's Armory said…
No they were very very decisive. Both The Companion Cavalry of Alexander, the cavalry of the State of Zhao during the Warring States, etc. Remember, both were heavily emulated by their contemporaries. Zhao's adoption of true cavalry was such that it nearly doubled the percentage of cavalry in Warring States armies from 5% chariotry to 10% deemed as cavalry.

It's just that before Stirrup, stability upon the horse is dangerous and a head long charge with a lance might knock you from your horse. Instead rider's legs have to lock and hug the hose's torso as they charged. Stirrups straps them into the horse itself, and later high heels were invented to further lock the rider into the seat

I can't say for the Roman Empire, I know the general academic's stance is they they neglected their cavalry. but since I'm not deeply read on the topic I'll refrain from comment. Though tangentially I am reading more about Claudius Gothicus and Diocletian's reforms of the cavalry arm. Diocletian did massive amount of reforms and they made quite a difference. From an organizational perspective looks like the Romans did care about their cavalry, a lot. Cavalry had quite a lot of impact during the war of the Tetrarchy, and they were both useful against the 2 main threats to the empire in mid and late empire. That of the Persians (Eran) and Migrating Germanic peoples.
Unknown said…
I wonder if it is really neccessary calling chinese heavy cavalry on stirrups by cataphracts... gives a false illusion they got it from central asia.. fully armored chinese heavy cavalry as old as qin dynasty and china the most plausible center of the invention of stirrups as seen from han dynasty finds..... the kushans in india were nothing but refugees from china "yuezhi exodus" and with hunnic/xiongnu elements, fallen indo-european speakers running away akin to the avars in Europe, push push.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cranial_deformation

"The practice of cranial deformation was brought to Bactria and Sogdiana by the Yuezhi, a tribe that created the Kushan Empire. Men with such skulls are depicted in various surviving sculptures and friezes of that time, such as the Kushan prince of Khalchayan"




Starting from the late antiquity we see the chinese-influenced military's dispersal across eurasia with the huns, a big family: Kidarites, Hephthalites, Alchon Huns, Xionites, Huna people etc..... stirrups, ring pommel swords (called sarmatian swords in the Roman empire), traction trebuchet and lamellar resembling han chinese

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamellar_helmet

"Lamellar helmets were adopted by the Sasanian Empire when they took control of former Hephthalite territory"

Avar or lombard warrior of Europe:
https://previews.agefotostock.com/previewimage/medibigoff/22e7e435eee10109d02f29a00f750d76/dae-vc000540.jpg

Chinese:

http://imgur.com/gallery/ETNFlX6

http://imgur.com/gallery/yaFBBuk


Korean but related:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Korea-Gaya_Warrior.jpg



It would be more logical the hunnic threat (Hephthalite–Sasanian Wars) exposed persians to stirrups, even a 'great wall of Iran' was built Great Wall of Gorgan in their defense...
Der said…
The 'Out of China' theory? ... Nice! I don't disagree, it would be great that China is the source of so much military technology. And I find it difficult to believe that Central Asian nomads were so inventive as to have created stirrups and other riding and fighting technology since we know that inventions are the fruit of settled civilizations. It would make sense China was the source of stirrups and it diffused to the rest of Eurasia by nomads who were defeated by Chinese dynasties. The Han dynasty was when mass conscription was abolished and an elite mounted heavy cavalry was adopted and perfected during the Three Kingdoms Period. Something technological must have changed in the latter years of the Han Dynasty to convert Han China from a Warring State with mass peasant conscripts infantry into a state that depended on elite heavy cavalry professional armies ... stirrups perhaps??
Unknown said…
Yeah.. the Huns were descended from Xiongnu who expanded westwards and mixed with Sakas, following these events, a horseback sino-iranian culture developed in Central Asia

Here are some articles:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://arkeotopia.org/images/documents/recherche/ArkeoLog65_GonthierE.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwif_9Cnv4fvAhXUGbkGHXJWBtYQFjAKegQIDxAC&usg=AOvVaw2RWyrERgj1Qu2qO2BmQLPt

https://www.academia.edu/12533551/Kiss_P_Attila_Huns_Germans_Byzantines_The_origins_of_the_narrow_bladed_long_seaxes_Acta_Archaeologica_Carpathica_49_2014_131_164


https://www.academia.edu/4064219/Chinese_and_East_Asian_Elements_in_Sarmatian_Culture_of_the_North_Pontic_Region
Orphydian said…
Hi there!



I'm reaching to you from your DeviantArt profile at https://www.deviantart.com/dorianclock

I'm here to kindly ask you to pay a short visit there and submit to our group’s gallery (link also provided there) your military art that I've indicated in the comments section of your profile.

We are glad to feature it. If you have other on the same thematic not uploaded at DeviantArt please consider doing uploading it and submit that as well!



Thank you in advance!

Steven
Unknown said…
看到评论区俺迷惑了,咋有些人就是管不住自己的臭嘴?中国在你眼里就不配有原创的文化是吧?不好的东西全要中国背锅,中国好的事物就必须得是你们欧洲赐予的?这个博主好心宣扬汉文化,是戳了棒子倭奴的肺管子了?还是损了你们白人的优越感?告诉你,中国人在用筷子吃饭的时候你们欧洲蛮子还在用手抓东西吃,中国人在记录历史的时候,你们欧洲人才刚学会写字呢。古埃及,罗马帝国,波斯帝国,时至今日早就全灭亡了,中国会延续至今难道是靠巧合?自己是啥货色心里还没点逼数么?
Intranetusa said…
What do you think of earlier ancient Chinese armored cavalry of the Han and Qin eras - do they qualify as some type of cataphract (eg. partially or fully armored horses)? There were horse armor made of very large lamellar plates for horses as early as the Qin Dynasty (or earlier), and the Chu Yen slips of the Western Han Dynasty said there were thousands of sets of horse armor in the Donghai armory inventory.
Dragon's Armory said…
Well there's definitely armors for the riders even as far back as the Western Han's beginning, many Western Han cavalry did have armored riders.

There were horse armor made of very large lamellar plates for horses as early as the Qin Dynasty (or earlier),
Well- the chariotry of the Spring and Autumn/ Warring States period did have bardings too, but its not quite cataphract level. Can you point me to the examples you yourself was referring to?
zhlcjw said…
Spring and Autumn/ Warring States may have armored cavalry,in the BC314,the Qi state sent 600 文骑(literal translation is “Patterned cavalry”) to attack the Yan state.There is a view that this patterned refers to the patterned on the armored horse.
Dragon's Armory said…
@zhlcjw

Oh wow, interesting, would love to read more about it if you have the sources.

This date would place the deployment in the Warring States period, and right during the period of Contention between Qi and Qin (this was when Qin rose to an unstoppable level under Qin Shihuang's grandfather.) It was also around this broad timeframe that Zhao became expert cavalrymen by imitating the steppe cavalry.

Popular Posts