Eastern Han (Late Han) Infantryman 东汉战士
2 Reconstructed suits of Han dynasty armor. Han dynasty armors are frequently attached to pauldrons. The heavier armors have a full armored sleeve to protect against the usually vulnerable armpits of the lamellar wearer. Many Han armors, such as the 襟领铠 Jīn lǐng kǎi, "Collared" lamellar armor also have raised back and side collars to protect against glancing sword slashes towards the wearer's neck.
Eastern Han dynasty golden belt buckle. Heavy Central Asian aesthetic influence apparent.
Figure of Chi you (蚩尤), a tribal leader that once fought against the
Yellow Emperor: the deified mythological ancestor of the Han people.
He is often depicted like a demonic or gremlin- like creature, with each
limb carrying a weapon and ready for war. Not only are his feet armed
but in many versions his head or his back also sports a crossbow
ready to fire at his enemies. For this he was often seen as a
god of war. Many Miao (Hmong) people saw Chiyou as
one of their ancient kings.
Comments
I meant, fighting in the same manner as the classic Roman legionaire with the classic gladius short sword and scutum large shield. In dense blocks of cohort sized unites with men shoulder to shoulder with the object of getting close and nasty with the object of stabbing (as opposed to slashing) the enemy in the abdomen area.
I would find this strange as the enemies encountered by Rome and China are different, with Rome fighting tribal Gauls and Germans who tended to lack armor and who recklessly charged in the Celtic manner on foot. The Roman method of throwing their javelins to break the charge and then engaging in hand to hand combat up close. The Han Chinese on the other hand fought nomadic horse riders shooting arrows from horseback.
Am I wrong? Or did most Eastern Han (Three Kingdoms) period infantry at that point fight other Chinese when Eastern Han devolved into warlordism?
More commonly though, you will see soldiers fighting with spears and dagger blade halberds called the Ji, there were also a lot of melee troops that used very tall shield pavise that formed shield walls and used spears in conjunction with it. There were also troops with long two handed steel swords used for hacking at foes. One interesting visual comparison in contrast with the Europeans is that a lot of the Han swords were not strapped on a cord and tied to the belt but has a buckle on the scabbard itself and locks into another buckle on the soldier's belt. Other soldiers straps the scabbard inside the belt on on the back of the belt.
You are right in saying that despite this profusion of different melee infantry types the Han would be geared to fight much more different enemies, and that is so. The Han employed crossbows en mass, they fielded many crossbowmen and even fielded many mounted crossbowmen as well. The crossbow were very critical to the success of the Han because the good ones not only out range the nomadic archers' bows but are also very easy to learn and operate, not to mention that once you streamline the production process you can field them in huge numbers. As for the way of fighting during this period. Well, actually by the tail end of the Han dynasty cavalry began to play more and more of a dominant role on the battlefield and cavalry armor became heavier during this period. The faud of the leg began to be commonly seen and let's not forget that Cao Cao's army of Wei dominated the fields with its cavalry.
Scales go upwards, not downwards.
If i am guessing correctly, it's a cavalry armor.
A close up of a Han dynasty scaled sleeve
https://us.v-cdn.net/5022456/uploads/editor/2f/xx8zy5d0dj26.jpg
Another
https://us.v-cdn.net/5022456/uploads/editor/ku/3gezkpdbgbz0.jpg
Hope this Helps!
https://us.v-cdn.net/5022456/uploads/editor/xq/4j98venejh5h.jpg
Idea is, it isn't so much about dynasty style, as it is about risk of blade going between rows of scales instead of sliding. Typically these orders were easily reverseable, or(quite rarely, though) this problem was dealt with specifically(say, medieval Russian scale armor had every single scale additionaly riveted through the center).
But, come to think of it, for shoulders this order makes much more sense even for the infantry. Simply because you wouldn't expect standing warrior being hit with hands straight down.
Is this art accurate and real than a Han dynasty foot soldier was?
I say this because looking at the drawing he has armor even on his arms, close to the wrist. (Right arm)
And it is the first representation that I see armor for the entire arm in that dynasty.